The newest survey contained step 3 parts. Part I integrated inquiries out-of socio-demographic study (years, number of degree, parity, familial money, industry, newest marital status, sexual hobby, reputation of HPV inoculation, and you may history of irregular cervical cancer screening).
Part II comprised of six questions regarding the goal women that should be screened, decades to begin with, volume, years otherwise criteria to get rid of away from evaluation, and methods away from evaluation. Just the professionals that has have you ever heard out-of HPV carry out go-ahead to help you Region III which assessed information about HPV away from its type (oncogenic otherwise non-oncogenic), setting of sign and you may reduction.
Prior to the investigation, the questionnaire of region II and region III into the Thai adaptation was in fact contemplated, talked about, and you will changed up until consensus one of 20 scientists have been every gynecologic oncologists (certain was article authors various other parallel degree). The professionals rated all of 19 concerns as the possibly ‘relevant’ or ‘maybe not relevant’. The object-level Blogs Legitimacy Directory (I-CVI) are computed per item, and also the Articles Authenticity Index (CVI) was computed by taking the typical ratio from fourteen questions about information about cervical cancer tumors screening and you can 5 questions about HPV. The fresh new CVI had been step one for both elements of brand new survey (S1 Desk). The latest accuracy are looked at during the 31 female with the exact same characteristic given that participants. The brand new Cronbach’ leader coefficients towards precision were 0.819 getting information about cervical cancer tumors assessment and 0.907 to possess knowledge about HPV.
Study collection
Into the day out-of scheduled colposcopy, the study secretary provided recommendations of your own investigation into feminine just who came across addition standards. The women exactly who offered to take part provided composed advised consent and you can replied new survey independently by themselves prior to proceeding to colposcopy.
Analysis collected for this research was basically socio-group investigation (Region I of questionnaire), expertise in cervical cancer tumors screening (Region II), and you will experience in HPV (Part III).
Mathematical data
The latest responses of real information in the cervical cancers evaluation and you can HPV was in fact examined by for every product just before rating categorization. Right respond to was scored given that step 1 while ‘completely wrong and you will unsure answer’ was obtained 0.
From fourteen concerns of cervical cancer tumors testing, feminine whose get had been ? ten were arbitrarily categorized as with ‘an effective knowledge’ usually was basically thought to be that have “not-good training”. Having experience with HPV, women whoever respond to is ‘never ever observed HPV’ had been excluded regarding the analysis from HPV training.
Out-of 5 inquiries, female whoever score were ? 3 was thought to be with ‘a good expertise in HPV’ or else just like the ‘unhealthy knowledge’. Out of 19 inquiries, feminine whose rating was basically ? 13 were classified as the that have ‘a beneficial total knowledge’ or else just like the ‘negative total knowledge’.
The investigation was indeed built-up for the a digital database and examined playing with SPSS V.twenty-six.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chi town, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics were utilized to analyze demographic data and you may was in fact summarized given that amounts having percentage, imply with practical departure otherwise median having diversity. The new association anywhere between for each adjustable and you will knowledge rating have been analyzed having fun with easy linear regression. Exploratory design is made inside the multivariable investigation also every parameters potentially pertaining to the details get. The latest felt level of analytical benefits is good p-worth of 0.05 or less.
Efficiency
Out of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>